Dave,
--- Dave Ketchum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Let's do it slowly:
Strange that you assume I didn't understand your point. You said you think
fractional votes are "reasonable." I only said I thought they're "undesirable."
Then, in this message, you say you "make no sense" of my point.
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 07:25:12 +0200 (CEST) Kevin Venzke wrote:
Dave,
--- Dave Ketchum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
* If each rank receives one half, then the results of the election will
be the same as if you ranked any one of the two as first and the other
second, so, in which case splitting
Dave,
--- Dave Ketchum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > * If each rank receives one half, then the results of the election will
> > be the same as if you ranked any one of the two as first and the other
> > second, so, in which case splitting your vote is not necessary, it merely
> > makes th
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 05:10:54 -0400 Donald Davison wrote:
Kevin, you wrote: "Donald, would you support IRV with equal-ranking
permitted, for the case that I have two first-choices and am willing to go
with whichever one has more support from other voters?"
Donald here: It is not clear as to how mu
Kevin, you wrote: "Donald, would you support IRV with equal-ranking
permitted, for the case that I have two first-choices and am willing to go
with whichever one has more support from other voters?"
Donald here: It is not clear as to how much of a vote each rank will be
receiving.
* If each r
