> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:24:00 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Kevin Venzke
> Subject: [EM] LNHarm performance: CDTT and Schulze
> I wrote a simulation to measure the rate of LNHarm failures under
> certain circumstances. I've used it to compare a CDTT method,
> Schulze(wv), Schulz
> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:24:00 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Kevin Venzke
> Subject: [EM] LNHarm performance: CDTT and Schulze
> Results:
>
> CDTT,MMPO,FPP: 13.7 LNHarm, 1177.5 LNHelp.
> Schulze(wv): 193 LNHarm, 750 LNHelp.
> Schulze(marg): 306 LNHarm, 675.5 LNHelp.
> Schulz
Dear Kevin,
you wrote (27 March 2005):
> The simulation works this way: There are five randomly-sized
> factions, which each rank a random number of the 4 candidates.
> The first faction always first votes C>D, and then changes
> their vote to C>D>A. When this causes C or D to lose, it's a
> Later
Hello,
I wrote a simulation to measure the rate of LNHarm failures under certain
circumstances. I've used it to compare a CDTT method, Schulze(wv),
Schulze(margins), and Schulze(opposition).
The simulation works this way: There are five randomly-sized factions,
which each rank a random number of
