Warren,
--- Warren Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> MDDA *if* all votes are full rank orderings, is just the "Smith set"
> and often yields a tied election. In fact often the Smith set is the entire
> set of candidates. (In most of Australia full rank orderings - i.e. none
> omitted -
> ar
MDDA *if* all votes are full rank orderings, is just the "Smith set"
and often yields a tied election. In fact often the Smith set is the entire
set of candidates. (In most of Australia full rank orderings - i.e. none
omitted -
are demanded by law.)
This seems a severe problem with MDDA and pr
Forest--
You wrote:
There are two things that bother me about MDDA: (1) The two cases that fall
back on Approval are diametrically opposed: the first case is when every
candidate is majority defeated, and the second case is when several are not
majority defeated. Why not just use Approval
