to vote again is superior to adding
special counting rules for tied rankings/votes.
Tom Ruen
P.S. I inserted limited comments below...
- Original Message -
From: Adam Tarr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: [EM] Plurality is not a yes
Tom Ruen wrote:
Plurality and runoffs (and Random ballot) don't need a checkbox-column style
ballot. They CAN be implemented by voters offering a single name on a
ballot. Similarly they can work without paper by voters using their bodies
as ballots, moving around a room and joining a single group
Adam Tarr says Approval voting can fit under Yes/No voting or Ratings voting,
however I deny that plurality can be classified as a yes/no voting method.
Labeling a class of methods as yes/no to me implies a series of independent
questions where a valid respond can consider independent
