Re: [EM] Re: 15 reasons to support DMC

2005-09-05 Thread Abd ulRahman Lomax
At 06:36 PM 9/5/2005, Stephane Rouillon wrote: I just asked if DMC was effective against order reversal, so if it is, please let me read about DMC ! You should know about http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Special:Allpages which is a complete list of pages on the Electorama wiki. It includes http

Re: [EM] Re: 15 reasons to support DMC

2005-09-05 Thread Stephane Rouillon
James Green-Armytage a écrit : > Forest writes, about DMC: > >17. It is resistant to the burying strategy that plagues some Condorcet > >methods. I just asked if DMC was effective against order reversal, so if it is, please let me read about DMC ! How does it work ? Who made it and when ? Steph

[EM] Re: 15 reasons to support DMC

2005-09-05 Thread James Green-Armytage
Forest writes, about DMC: >17. It is resistant to the burying strategy that plagues some Condorcet >methods. I think that this is an idea that should be supported and expanded. Perhaps it is true, but I'd like to see an argument. I still claim that cardinal pairwise and AWP shou

[EM] Re: 15 reasons to support DMC

2005-08-29 Thread Araucaria Araucana
On 28 Aug 2005 at 16:55 UTC-0700, Dave Ketchum wrote: > I continue to question adding Approval to Condorcet - can it really > be worth the pain of trying to be understood? > > PS - a few days ago I found out about the Condorcet group, that DMC > is important there, and looked for a definition - fin

[EM] RE: 15 reasons

2005-08-24 Thread Simmons, Forest
Three more reasons: 16. Like any method that makes germane use of both ordinal and approval information it is well adapted to three-slot ballots, i.e. voters that don't want to submit complete rankings can opt to have their approval order extended by the order of their favorite. 17. It is