[EM] Re: Bucklin-Condorcet PR (also Bucklin PR)

2003-08-14 Thread Chris Benham
Previously, on Friday, August 8, 2003 I posted a suggested ranked-ballot PR method that combines Generalized Bucklin and Condorcet. It wrongly included: "Equal preferences are divided into equal fractions (which sum to 1)". I now think it is fine if equal preference for A and B are counted Ap

Re: [EM] Re: Bucklin-Condorcet PR (also Bucklin PR)

2003-08-14 Thread Chris Benham
Dave Ketchum wrote: On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 06:57:33 +0930 Chris Benham wrote in part: Previously, on Friday, August 8, 2003 I posted a suggested ranked-ballot PR method that combines Generalized Bucklin and Condorcet. It wrongly included: "Equal preferences are divided into equal fractions (whi

Re: [EM] Re: Bucklin-Condorcet PR (also Bucklin PR)

2003-08-12 Thread Dave Ketchum
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 06:57:33 +0930 Chris Benham wrote in part: Previously, on Friday, August 8, 2003 I posted a suggested ranked-ballot PR method that combines Generalized Bucklin and Condorcet. It wrongly included: "Equal preferences are divided into equal fractions (which sum to 1)". I now