Re: [EM] Re: Burying and defection with the "defeat-droppers".

2005-03-22 Thread James Green-Armytage
>As far as I can tell from your website, with some >beating about the bush, yes. If pressed as to which >you think is the best plain ranked-ballot method for >public political elections, I gather you reccomend >using Winning Votes with either Beat Path, Ranked >Pairs or River. Yeah, so f

Re: [EM] Re: Burying and defection with the "defeat-droppers".

2005-03-21 Thread Jobst Heitzig
Dear Chris and James! James answered to Chris: >> 46 abc >> 44 bca (sincere is bac) >> 05 cab >> 05 cba >> >> So the obvious question I ask you is this: Why then do you >> reccomend methods that elect B? > > Do I? First of all, my recommendation of winning votes methods is > tenuous. Second,

[EM] Re: Burying and defection with the "defeat-droppers".

2005-03-21 Thread Chris Benham
James G-A, Referring to this example, 46 abc 44 bca (sincere is bac) 05 cab 05 cba I asked you why you "reccomend methods that elect b", and you replied (Mon.Mar.21): > Do I? As far as I can tell from your website, with some beating about the bush, yes. If pressed as to which you think is the b

[EM] Re: Burying and defection with the "defeat-droppers".

2005-03-21 Thread James Green-Armytage
Hi Chris, Some replies follow... >46 abc >44 bca (sincere is bac) >05 cab >05 cba > >So the obvious question I ask you is this: Why then >do you reccomend >methods that elect B? Do I? First of all, my recommendation of winning votes methods is tenuous. Second, I suggest that thi