James G-A,
You wrote (Thu.Dec.9,04):
Am I correct in thinking that this meets the criteria mentioned above?
>>Does this seem like a sensible way to do IRV-completed Condorcet in
>>general?
>>
>>
>My answer to your first question is that it seems to me that it does,
>and it also seem
Hi folks, this is James Green-Armytage replying to Chris Benham.
>>Am I correct in thinking that this meets the criteria mentioned above?
>>Does this seem like a sensible way to do IRV-completed Condorcet in
>>general?
>>
>>
>My answer to your first question is that it seems to me that it does,
James G-A,
You recently wrote:
The topic of this posting is a version of IRV-completed Condorcet that
seems to pass Steve's truncation resistance criteria, aka Mike's strategy
free criteria.
I had proposed something else back in July, involving something I called a
"UMID" set, but I think Chris has
