Re: [EM] Re: EM] There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.

2004-02-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> It was my understanding that Arrow's theorum does apply to CR. Actually > it applies to Approval as well, it's just that Approval meets all of the > conditions except allowing voters to rank three or more choices in > order. It was my understanding that Arrow's theorem only applies to ordinal

[EM] Re: EM] There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.

2004-02-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Ossipoff wrote: > CR is strategically equiovalent to Approval: In CR, you maximize your expectation by giving maximum points to those candidates for whom you'd vote in Approval, and giving minimum points to the rest. That's not entirely accurate. It's true that in CR, you maximize your expe

Re: [EM] Re: EM] There's nothing wrong with Average Rating.

2004-02-26 Thread Bart Ingles
It was my understanding that Arrow's theorum does apply to CR. Actually it applies to Approval as well, it's just that Approval meets all of the conditions except allowing voters to rank three or more choices in order. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > I like CR & Approval as well, in particular