Last post on this subject for me for the time being. We're well
into the glue factory stage.
Paul Kislanko wrote:
The
assumption that my second choice for first would be the second on my
ranked ballot IF I HAD KNOWN THAT MY FIRST CHOICE WASN T AVAILABLE is not
warranted,
I think the disagreement
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Small
Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004
7:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EM] Re: Election-methods
Digest, Vol 3, Issue 18
Paul Kislanko wrote:
>Prove that you can infer my pair-wise choi
Alex Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>OK, well, let's sit down and chat. I say to you "Paul, which candidate
>do you most want to win?" You ponder it and then you give me an answer.
>If you don't then you haven't made up your mind and you won't be voting
>in this election. Or at least I assum
Paul Kislanko wrote:
>Prove that you can infer my pair-wise choices from my ranked ballot, if you>want to use my ranked ballot to populate a pair-wise matrix.>>It can't be done. So just allow the voters to explicitly input their pair-wise preferences.>
>This is not rocket science.
Um, OK.
Let's t
