Gervase Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> From: Matthew Dempsky
>> Subject: Re: [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 4, Issue 13
>> Date: Thursday 14 October 2004 02:09 am
>
>> On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 20:45, Gervase Lam wrote:
>> > Kemeny can be basicall
> From: Gervase Lam
> Subject: Re: [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 4, Issue 13
> Date: Thursday 14 October 2004 22:41 pm
> > From: Matthew Dempsky
> > Subject: Re: [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 4, Issue 13
> > Date: Thursday 14 October 2004 02:09 am
>
> From: Matthew Dempsky
> Subject: Re: [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 4, Issue 13
> Date: Thursday 14 October 2004 02:09 am
> On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 20:45, Gervase Lam wrote:
> > Kemeny can be basically described as follows:
> > [...example elided...]
>
>
This weekend, I thought I would use Kemeny's Method on the following
example that Steve Eppley used in order to demonstrate MAM to me:
4: A>B>C
3: B>C>A
2: C>A>B
Result Matrix:
A B C
A [- 6 4]
B [3 - 7]
C [5 2 -]
> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 20:51:43 EDT
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [EM
