Kevin,
Previously, I wrote:
CB:In step 1, why did you specify that voters only rank the candidates "they would
be willing to support"? What the hell is the "approval cutoff" for? Pardon my tone,
but I have no sympathy for the stupid tendency to want to confuse ranking with rating.
To which yo
Chris,
--- Chris Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>> While there is no CW,
>> Eliminate the Approval loser.
> "Voters rank the candidates, equal preferences ok. Also voters insert an
> Approval cutoff, default is between 1 and 2. (Yes/No option for each
> candidate is also ok, with def
Kevin Venzke wrote (Mon. Sep.1,03):
This leads me to the other topic. The most "common" Condorcet-Approval hybrid,
it seems to me, is to elect the Approval winner among the Smith set members.
I've read that there is concern about strategy incentives under those rules.
I wonder if that concern c
