Re: [EM] Re: Is range voting the panacea we need?

2005-01-04 Thread Bart Ingles
Chris Benham wrote: Ok, suppose there are two candidates and three voters, and the voting method is Range Voting using the scale 0-100. All three voters are completely sincere. Voters 1 and 2 both prefer candidate A to candidate B, but not by much and they are not very impressed by either. The

[EM] Re: Is range voting the panacea we need?

2005-01-03 Thread Chris Benham
"Bayesian regret". I  may not be completely  on  top of the "technical" definition of  "Bayesian regret", but I know what "regret" is, and  I  have this explanation from  Warren D. Smith  of what he means by the term. This is from page 13  of  his paper  "Candidate Incentives under different v

[EM] Re: Is range voting the panacea we need?

2005-01-02 Thread RLSuter
Chris, Your arguments aren't making much sense to me. You quote one advocate of range voting regarding "regret" and majority rule and suggest that all range voting advocates say the same thing. What evidence do you have that most RV advocates say this, or even that it is what the one person you qu

Re: [EM] Re: Is range voting the panacea we need?

2005-01-02 Thread FL
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:26:05 +1030, Chris Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Florian Legyel asked me (Sat.Jan1): > > >What is the sensible and fair argument linking the minimization of > >Bayesian regret by range voting with the emotional states of voters? > > > CB: I could perhaps have omitted

[EM] Re: Is range voting the panacea we need?

2005-01-02 Thread Chris Benham
Florian Legyel asked me (Sat.Jan1): What is the sensible and fair argument linking the minimization of Bayesian regret by range voting with the emotional states of voters? CB: I could perhaps have omitted the word "Bayesian", because that just refers to "averaged over a vast number of randomiz

Re: [EM] Re: Is range voting the panacea we need?

2005-01-01 Thread FL
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 00:33:11 +1030, Chris Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ralph Suter wrote (Wed.Dec.15): > > them? CB: Range Voting is fine if all one cares about is "minimizing > Bayesian regret" (Warren D. Smith, one of the paper's > authors) or meeting the "Favourite Betrayal Cri

[EM] Re: Is Range Voting the panacea we need? (repeat, with missing link)

2005-01-01 Thread Chris Benham
Ralph Suter wrote (Wed.Dec.15): Will someone on the list who has studied range voting and compared it to Condorcet, approval, and other methods please comment on Doug Greene's paper? He appears to be saying that range voting is superior to all other single winner method

[EM] Re: Is range voting the panacea we need?

2005-01-01 Thread Chris Benham
Ralph Suter wrote (Wed.Dec.15): Will someone on the list who has studied range voting and compared it to Condorcet, approval, and other methods please comment on Doug Greene's paper? He appears to be saying that range voting is superior to all other single winner methods. Are there good a