James Green-Armytage wrote:
> Because the electoral college is widely recognized to be an
> anti-democratic antique, left over from the time that ordinary
> people were not trusted with the decision of electing the
> president.
I think that misses the point. It's true that the writers of the
Cons
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>So.here's a weird little ammendment to your plan
... I think proportional EV allocation is not my own plan; my plan was EV
allocation by popular vote.
>that states might
>find more attractive. What if, say, California proposed a law like
>this :
>"we will
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 06:27:50 -0400, James Green-Armytage
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If I lived in a swing state, I would be all for a proportional
> allocation. It's just more fair, less unstable. Who really wants to be in
> the middle of the kind of craziness that they have in Florida the
