Dear Mike,
the assumption that each voter casts a complete ranking
of all candidates is on page 5 (i.e. in the introduction)
of their paper (Jonathan Levin, Barry Nalebuff, "An
Introduction to Vote-Counting Schemes", Journal of
Economic Perspectives, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3--26,
Winter 1995):
> For
Dear Mike,
you wrote (20 March 2005):
> In the _Journal of Economic Perspective_, for Winter
> '85, Simson-Kramer is defined as electing the candidate
> whose greatest votes for him in a pairwise comparison
> is greater than any other candidate's greatest votes
> for him in a pairwise comparison.
