Re: [EM] Using weights to compensate multiple votes (Any feedback ?please !??)

2004-08-25 Thread Steve Eppley
Bart I asked: Steve Eppley wrote: -snip- Steven Brams, I presume. But it's such an unimportant property, since it's laughably unrealistic to assume voters' sincere preferences are dichotomous when there are more than two candidates. It's a product of the publish or perish syndrome, most

[EM] Using weights to compensate multiple votes (Any feedback ? please !??)

2004-08-24 Thread Philippe Errembault
Isn't there really anyone interrested in this topic ? Or amIjust much too confusing in my explanations ??? I'd like to get feedback on this topic, please... It's about normalising the enthropy (amount of information) contained in of an "approval like" vote. Philippe Errembault -

Re: [EM] Using weights to compensate multiple votes (Any feedback ? please !??)

2004-08-24 Thread Warren Schudy
As I understand it, your scheme, unlike regular approval, fails the Favorite Betrayal Criterion (FBC). Suppose there is a close race between two major candidates, call them Bush and Kerry. Suppose a voter has a favorite that is neither Bush nor Kerry. In regular approval, a rational voter will