Re: [EM] Who can't solve 2 candidate elections

2005-01-09 Thread Markus Schulze
Dear Craig, you did not answer my question why --despite of the fact that FPP satisfies e.g. anonymity, neutrality, non-dictatorship, Pareto, strategyproofness, monotonicity, participation, consistency, and resolvability in the 2-candidate 1-winner case-- FPP does not "solve" the 2-candidate 1-win

Re: [EM] Who can't solve 2 candidate elections

2005-01-08 Thread Markus Schulze
uld have to mention a desirable criterion that is _not_ satisfied by FPP in the 2-candidate 1-winner case. Markus Schulze > > [EM] Who can't solve 2 candidate elections > > Markus Schulze markus.schulze at alumni.tu-berlin.de > > Fri Jan 7 07:10:56 PST 2005 > > > >

Re: [EM] Who can't solve 2 candidate elections

2005-01-07 Thread Markus Schulze
Dear Craig, you wrote (7 Jan 2005): > Well, I didn't underestimate your intelligence when I > expected that you would be perfectly unable to solve > the easy problem of deriving a solution to the 2 candidate > 1 winner election problem. Well, this depends on what you mean with "solving" 2-candida