Hi,
> The Smith set certainly has lots of names. It´s the Smith set,
> the minimal dominant set, and now the GeTCha set too.
I usually call it the top cycle. The disadvantage of this name
is that when there's a Condorcet Winner, the "top cycle" is
not a cycle.
--Steve
Election-methods mai
>
>The Smith set certainly has lots of names. It´s the Smith set, the
>minimal
>dominant set, and now the GeTCha set too.
Yes. GeTChA was Schwartz's term. It's a bit silly, perhaps. I think that
minimal dominant set is the most straightforward, but I can recognize it
by any of the other
James--
You wrote:
Here again is the reference to Schwartz's book, where he defines the
minimal dominant set (GeTChA set) along with the union of minimal
undominated sets (GOChA set), and a few others.
I reply:
The Smith set certainly has lots of names. It´s the Smith set, the minimal
domi
