Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:26:23 +0100 (CET)
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Kevin=20Venzke?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... Approval is more vulnerable to bad information. The Approval/STV hybrid is notably better, I think.
Kevin Venzke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kevin,
I would like to understand this better. Are
From: Steve Eppley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:06:08 -0800
Ken Johnson wrote:
Forest Simmons wrote:
-snip-
A more fundamental goal might be to go with the choice that
would be acceptable to the greatest number of voters.
That sounds like Approval. The method
Ken,
--- Ken Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
So back to my original question, what is an appropriate
definition of the goal of single-winner voting by which the merits of
alternative voting systems can be evaluated?
My measurement is: If the voters were able to gather in a huge room,
James Green-Armytage wrote:
Let's say that 55% of an electorate are to the left of the center,
and 45% are to the right of center. If a method goes ahead and
elects a right of center candidate anyway, then we know something
has gone wrong.
11 - L:10,C:0,R:0
44 - L:1,C:10,R:0
45 -
