On Sep 6, 2005, at 04:47, Warren Smith wrote:
So. from the point of view of US third parties,
1. all Condorcet methods plausibly lead
to 2-party domination, though we cannot be sure,
2. all are more complicated
than range voting, and
3. range voting apparently does NOT lead to 2-party dominatio
At 09:47 PM 9/5/2005, Warren Smith wrote:
So. from the point of view of US third parties,
1. all Condorcet methods plausibly lead
to 2-party domination, though we cannot be sure,
2. all are more complicated
than range voting, and
3. range voting apparently does NOT lead to 2-party domination.
T
To recount some recent history. I at first had this idea that all
Condorcet methods would lead to 2-party domination.
I in fact produced a "proof" of that (well, a proof of a related statement,
anyhow)
and put it on the CRV web site. Then one of the attacks on my proof (by Adam
Tarr) was that
m
