Re: [EM] non-deterministic methods for better strategy proofness

2004-06-13 Thread Dave Ketchum
I get dizzy on his one but, if a majority of voters prefer B, why do they not simply vote B, and quit talking about strategy? Dave Ketchum On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 15:38:36 +0200 Jobst Heitzig wrote: Markus mentioned Pattanaiks work on strategy-proofness, and I read the book in the meantime. This and

[EM] non-deterministic methods for better strategy proofness

2004-06-13 Thread Jobst Heitzig
Markus mentioned Pattanaiks work on strategy-proofness, and I read the book in the meantime. This and the fact that the Random Dictator Method is completely strategy-proof got me thinking about introducing a certain randomness into Condorcet methods. This is what I came up with. The essential point