Dear Forest Simmons,
before you go on:
1. Please post an authoritative definition for the
"Dutta set"! (Please post one that doesn't presume
that there are no pairwise ties!)
2. Please post an authoritative definition for
"Condorcet lottery"! (As far as I remember correctly,
Jobst He
Dear Forest!
Your sprucing up technique is a very nice idea since it can simplify the
tallying of those methods which fulfil beat-clone-proofness and
uncoveredness. However, some of which you wrote has confused me
completely: Did I understand you right in that you claim that the
technique shou
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 13:40:07 -0800
From: Ted Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [EM] Re: Sprucing up MMPO and other methods
...
I have a question about the first stage, eliminating covered candidates:
On 21 Dec 2004 at 16:09 PST, Forest Simmons wrote:
1. Eliminate covered candidates until each
From: Gervase Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [EM] MMPO, Majority, Condorcet failures
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:59:38 +1030
From: Chris Benham
Subject: [EM] MMPO, Majority, Condorcet failures
To me the price MMPO (MinMax Pairwise Opposition) pays for strategy
benefits you describe is just fa
