Re: [EM] Approval for many candidate, non-partisan, multi-seat elections

Dear Rob Lanphier, I have made the experience that the members of Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) work rather independently and that the one ArbCom member is rarely willing to revert the decision of the other ArbCom member. Therefore, I suggest that the ArbCom should be elected by a

RE: [EM] Approval for many candidate, non-partisan, multi-seat elections

Markus Schulze Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 12:10 PM I have made the experience that the members of Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) work rather independently and that the one ArbCom member is rarely willing to revert the decision of the other ArbCom member. Therefore, I

RE: [EM] Approval for many candidate, non-partisan, multi-seat elections

Rob Lanphier Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 9:46 AM As you saw earlier, some people on Wikipedia are considering a switch to Bloc voting (plurality-at-large) for a multi-seat election, away from Approval. Whatever the merits or de-merits of multi-seat Approval, I am sure Bloc Voting

RE: [EM] Approval for many candidate, non-partisan, multi-seat elections

James, --- James Gilmour [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Markus Schulze Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 12:10 PM I have made the experience that the members of Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) work rather independently and that the one ArbCom member is rarely willing to revert the