James,
--- James Green-Armytage [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Kevin, you wrote:
This seems like a new interpretation. I believe both this interpretation
and
ERB(fractional) satisfy monotonicity, since in neither method can raising
a candidate cause any other candidate to get their votes
I see, said the idiot. Please ignore my previous post on this topic. I
was failing to comprehend the intricacies of the difference between
Bucklin and ER-Bucklin(whole), some of which are explained below by
Kevin Venzke.
Jim Faran
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 10:05, Kevin Venzke wrote:
James,
---
Kevin, you wrote:
This seems like a new interpretation. I believe both this interpretation
and
ERB(fractional) satisfy monotonicity, since in neither method can raising
a candidate cause any other candidate to get their votes earlier.
Does my interpretation of ER-Bucklin(whole) satisfy FBC? (And,
Kevin, you wrote:
40 ABD
35 DB
25 CD
B wins, with 75 votes in the second round.
Now let's raise B on some ballots:
40 A=BD
35 DB
25 CD
Now candidate D wins, with 100 votes in the second round.
So, quite clearly, ER-Bucklin fails monotonicity.
Yes, this is interesting. However, I suggest that
James,
By the way, I didn't specify ER-Bucklin(whole) because I didn't believe that
ERB(fractional) had been defined.
--- James Green-Armytage [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Yes, this is interesting. However, I suggest that ER-Bucklin(whole) should
perhaps be tallied in a different way. In the
James (and Chris),
Something does occur to me:
--- James Green-Armytage [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Yes, this is interesting. However, I suggest that ER-Bucklin(whole) should
perhaps be tallied in a different way. In the second example, you assume
for tally purposes that D is in 2nd place
Kevin Venzke wrote:
This seems like a new interpretation. I believe both this
interpretation and
ERB(fractional) satisfy monotonicity, since in neither method
can raising
a candidate cause any other candidate to get their votes earlier.
Actually, this is the only interpetation I've ever
At 05:28 AM 6/29/2005, James Green-Armytage wrote:
Yes, this is interesting. However, I suggest that ER-Bucklin(whole) should
perhaps be tallied in a different way. In the second example, you assume
for tally purposes that D is in 2nd place on the A=BD ballots. However, I
suggest that we should
