> James Gilmour wrote:
> >Your definition relies on the answer to a question that is
> asked only
> >very rarely, and is never asked in a real election. (It was
> asked in
> >the Scottish Social Attitudes Survey, shortly after the
> >two elections to the Scottish Parliament, but that is
> exc
James Gilmour wrote:
>Your definition relies on the answer to a question that is asked only
>very rarely, and is never
>asked in a real election. (It was asked in the Scottish Social Attitudes
>Survey, shortly after the
>two elections to the Scottish Parliament, but that is exceptional.) In a
>re
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >What is sincere (= will best achieve the desired
> >result = election of most preferred candidate) in one voting system
James Green-Armytage Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 4:07 AM
>
> This isn't how I generally understand the concept of sincere
> voting. In a ran
At 8:07 PM -0800 3/25/04, James Green-Armytage wrote:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What is sincere (= will best achieve the desired
result = election of most preferred candidate) in one voting system
This isn't how I generally understand the concept of sincere voting. In a
ranked ballot system, I wo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>What is sincere (= will best achieve the desired
>result = election of most preferred candidate) in one voting system
This isn't how I generally understand the concept of sincere voting. In a
ranked ballot system, I would hold sincere voting to the following
definition
> James Gilmour said:
>
> I would suggest that analysing (counting) by a
> different method the voting patterns of votes cast for
> counting under one method will not give a
> very useful result.
>
MIKE OSSIPOFF > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 11:59 PM
>
> ...unless sincere voting is assumed.
