Re: [EM] Theoretical Gerrymandering Solution

2005-02-22 Thread matt
> This sounds somewhat promising. Can you cite any sources on the > mathematically unsolvable nature of this problem, or expand on that a > little bit? This is a technical topic but optimization problems of this type are computationally NP hard to solve. Doing this would be radical departure from

RE: [EM] Theoretical Gerrymandering Solution

2005-02-22 Thread Paul Kislanko
onio, but it would not allow them to split the Dallas voters up into 4 different districts. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ] On Behalf Of Steven Barney > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 3:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [EM] Theoretical Gerrymandering Solution

2005-02-22 Thread Steven Barney
Matt?: This sounds somewhat promising. Can you cite any sources on the mathematically unsolvable nature of this problem, or expand on that a little bit? Thank you very much, SB - Original Message -- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:31:40 -0500 (EST) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [EM] Theoreti

Re: [EM] Theoretical Gerrymandering Solution

2005-02-14 Thread Curt Siffert
The problem is that the very decision of how to approach boundaries is a political decision. Since Democrats tend to clump together in very small regions, then having extremely regular shapes (or having areas that match up to city or county boundaries) can lead to single districts with a very