On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Jobst Heitzig wrote:
Dear Forest!
When I understand you right, you propose to just strike out all strongly
covered candidates and then use Random Ballot on the rest, right?
But then there must be some error in your proof of monotonicity, I fear --
look at the following exampl
I would like to mention some other properties of the variation on MacSmith
that I suggested below. For reference first I give a brief description of
the method:
"Random Ballot, Non Strongly Covered"
Ballots are ordinal or cardinal with approval cutoffs or some other way of
indicating approval.
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:37:05 +0100
From: Jobst Heitzig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [EM] R.B.MacSmith
Anti-strategic properties:
I did not yet test many anti-strategy criteria, but the main
anti-strategic feature is that, due to the above-mentioned
randomization, in every majority which think
