In a message dated 97-10-03 07:18:36 EDT, you write:
>100 voters, 6 options (I don't want to know about examples with more
>options!)
>BCDFEA25
>CDFEAB24
>...long...
>Unless we can find some way making Condorcet acceptable, the details
>are of purely academic interest.
Consider two v
Dear David,
you wrote (29 Sep 1997):
> Thank you for your responses. You inspired me to look through
> the archives more thoroughly. I still don't understand the sub-cycle
> rule, though. First, do you have a reference to Tideman, MIIAC and
> GITC?
