In Re: Condorect sub-cycle rule, Sat, Oct 4, 1997 12:18 PM EDT Mr. Schulze
copied an example from Mr. Saari regarding clones
> [Saari] Assume the following ratings (opinions):
>
> Apple-1 Apple-2 Apple-3 Chocolate (Ranking)
> 20% Exc(99) Exc(98) Exc(97) Exc(95) A1>A2>A3>Ch
> 20% Exc(97) Exc(
Correction:
In my last e-mail, it must mean "Anonymity" instead of
"Autonomy."
***
Dear Mike Saari,
you wrote (3 Jul 1998):
> If these are the famous "Arrow" criteria, then one of
> them (I'm not sure which name) states that the outcome can
> depend ONLY on the "preferences" of the voters.
In a message dated 98-07-03 13:04:34 EDT, you write:
>Of course, there are only six important criteria: Pareto, Autonomy,
>Neutrality, Non-Dictatorship, Invulnerability by Exaggeration, and
>Independence from Irrelevant Alternatives.
>
>Unfortunately, it is impossible for an election method to me
Dear Demorep,
you wrote (25 Jun 1998):
> For the folks who do NOT live on the various criteria (such as me),
> I ask how many criteria are out there in internet land ? Perhaps
> some expert in such criteria may want to post them.
Of course, there are only six important criteria: Pareto, Autonom
