[EM] Ranked Pairs, continued

2002-03-22 Thread MIKE OSSIPOFF
To continue what I was saying about Ranked Pairs (RP), I like SSD, CSSD, & RP because they only drop (or decline to keep) a defeat if it's the weakest defeat in a cycle, and that gives them compliance with GSFC & SDSC. PC at least meets SFC. For PC & SSD, the problem with cycles is that there m

[EM] Proportional Representation System with Hare Quotas

2002-03-22 Thread DEMOREP1
Proportional Representation System with Hare Quotas 22 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- There is a very strong fixation with having 1 vote per seat in legislative bodies. A candidate will initially get more than, equal to or less than the Total Votes/ Total Seats ratio. The excess votes (or lose

Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention

2002-03-22 Thread Joe Weinstein
First, I want to thank Forest for a number of recent instances where - likely better and certainly more rapidly than I could myself - he has explained and clarified my proposals. In my opinion - see example below - the practical merit of a districting scheme generally can NOT reduce to only a

Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention

2002-03-22 Thread Forest Simmons
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Michael Rouse wrote: > chosing a winner. If there were some clear standard, we could (as others > have suggested) solicit plans not only from computer models and the parties > involved, but from ordinary citizens, and then choose the best one. Heck, > you could have a distrib

[EM] above/below line voting

2002-03-22 Thread Forest Simmons
Recently someone mentioned the above/below line options for voting in Australian elections. It was mentioned that most voters just choose to vote above the line, i.e. trust their favorite party to take care of the details. In a way this is just designating their party as proxy to use their vote a

Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention

2002-03-22 Thread Michael Rouse
- Original Message - From: "Adam Tarr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 7:55 AM Subject: Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention > Michael wrote: > > >Draw a line between the population centroid and the > >voting centroid (or population median and

Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention

2002-03-22 Thread Adam Tarr
Michael wrote: >Draw a line between the population centroid and the >voting centroid (or population median and voting median), and continue until >you have the number of districts you want. That way, roughly equal voters >and residents would be in each district. As you implied before, this could

Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention

2002-03-22 Thread Michael Rouse
- Original Message - From: "Jurij Toplak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 2:03 AM Subject: Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention > > Most of the countries draw districts according to the total "population". > Some draw them according to the "total

Re: [EM] More on Gerrymander prevention

2002-03-22 Thread Jurij Toplak
> Another way to lessen (though not eliminate) gerrymandering would be to > apportion districts by the total number of *votes* cast in the general > election rather than the total *population* of the United States and divide > by the total number of representatives. Then apportion representativ