At 02\12\20 23:04 + Friday, James Gilmour wrote:
>> At 02\12\20 14:16 + Friday, James Gilmour wrote:
>> >Craig Carey wrote (in part):
>> >>
>> >> It might seem that in a 6 candidate election, the paper (ABC) is more
>> >> about A,B,C, than about D,E,F. But it can be expanded out like th
> At 02\12\20 14:16 + Friday, James Gilmour wrote:
> >Craig Carey wrote (in part):
> >>
> >> It might seem that in a 6 candidate election, the paper (ABC) is more
> >> about A,B,C, than about D,E,F. But it can be expanded out like this:
> >>
> >> 1(ABC) = ((ABCDEF) + (ABCDFE) + (ABCEDF) +
Narins, Josh said:
> Alex, AMEN!
That's right! Haleluiah!
> I think Craig and Donald are on to us.
It doesn't matter. The time-table is set. They will soon be down in
Guantanamo with the other skeptics of Approval Voting and Condorcet.
> Our scam, which we have been carefully planning since
Craig Carey said:
> The man-cow, Russ P., probably is reluctant to copy that page onto the
> black website that was translated into French.
If you're going to keep personally insulting people, especially people not
active on the list, and using insults unrelated to any of their statements
on votin
Condorcet has a good chance of going right to the voter
median in Condorcet's 1st election, instead of in the 2nd election
as Approval might do, if people's estimates were off in the 1st election.
Mike Ossipoff
--
I think it is best to assume that the 2nd Approval election is independent
of the
Alex, AMEN!
I think Craig and Donald are on to us.
Our scam, which we have been carefully planning since 1283 AD/CE, is to make
sure that our candidate, who for now must remain nameless, wins in 2032 with
our devious tactic of having "garbage" vote. We are currently en-grossed in
registering mos
At 02\12\20 14:16 + Friday, James Gilmour wrote:
>Craig Carey wrote (in part):
>>
>> It might seem that in a 6 candidate election, the paper (ABC) is more
>> about A,B,C, than about D,E,F. But it can be expanded out like this:
>>
>> 1(ABC) = ((ABCDEF) + (ABCDFE) + (ABCEDF) + (ABCEFD) + (ABCFDE)
Here is my matrix for Kemeny's Rule with 3 candidates. Please let me know if I
got it right or wrong.
Here is an example of a Kemeny Rule tally for profile p, p=(1,1,0,0,0,0),
where the first thru sixth columns represent, respectively, the number of ABC,
ACB, CAB, CBA, BCA, and BAC voters.
Vot
Her are some examples constructed to be similar to the example that was
recently provided.
The Alternative Vote is only discarding about 17% of the vote which is a lot less than what it can do for
4 candidates.
These 1 winner 5 candidate examples are designed to:
* Have B win
* Have an order
I must admit I'm not the least bit surprised that Donald Davison has not
responded to my message from 12/18. This is standard debating style for
Donald -- post an inflammatory criticism of Condorcet or Approval, ignore
the reasoned responses, rinse, repeat. Would it be too much to ask him to
Donald said:
> Mike Ossipoff wrote:
>
> In my most recent message, the following passage was accidentally
> left in after it had been discovered to be incorrect:
>
> "(In ordinary Approval, the fact that the Dems are more numerous than
> the Nader people means that the Dem candidates will outscore
Craig Carey wrote (in part):
>
> It might seem that in a 6 candidate election, the paper (ABC) is more
> about A,B,C, than about D,E,F. But it can be expanded out like this:
>
> 1(ABC) = ((ABCDEF) + (ABCDFE) + (ABCEDF) + (ABCEFD) + (ABCFDE) + (ABCFED))/6
>
> So every single paper is a paper that ca
Hi Forest.
I find your message incomprehensible and most of the problem is with the
English words. This is not a message that is sent merely to create an
opportunity for you to subsequently write nothing. The geometry of
voting is somewhat really simple. There is plain space and a dimension
for
12/19/02 - `Mikeo the man of many Typos'
Greetings list members,
Mike Ossipoff wrote:
In my most recent message, the following passage was accidentally
left in after it had been discovered to be incorrect:
"(In ordinary Approval, the fact that the Dems are more numerous than
the Nader people me
14 matches
Mail list logo
