>> Subject: [EM] FBC ambiguity & language for EM
The quotes here were from a message that didn't use quote
marks, so when I started trimming it, it quickly became
impossible to recall who said what. So I'm probably replying
to several people, identity lost.
>> Ok, th
MIKE OSSIPOFF wrote:
> Still, I'll say that my official version of my definition of voting
> Smith over Jones is the
> one that adds that it must _not_ be possible to contrive a configuration
> of the
> other people's ballots such that, if we delete everyone but Smith &
> Jones from the
> ball
ADVERTISEMENT
MIKE OSSIPOFF wrote:
>As a practical mattter, I haven't found a need to specify the same
>scenario, but that
>doesn't mean that someone else shouldn't do so. But it seems to me that
>it's universally
>understood in discussions of voting system criteria & examples that
>"ou
