I would like to make a suggestion for a multiple winner proportional
method that is as good or better than any I have heard proposed so far,
short of the Proportional Approval Voting (PAV) that Michael Welford and I
proposed several weeks ago. (Full strength PAV would involve checking all
of the t
Don wrote:
> Your two person co-chair election should be conducted as follows:
> 1) Divide the total votes by the number of seats. This is known as
>the Hare Quota. You should get two halves. One half will end up on one
>candidate and the other half will end up on another candidate.
>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 02/24/01
Dear Moe, you wrote:
>From: "Moe St. EverGreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 13:53:20 -0500
>Subject: [EM] Multiple Winner Elections
>What are the best
Subject:
Re: [EM] Multiple Winner Elections
Date:
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:20:37 -0800
From:
Bart Ingles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
"Moe St. EverGreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References:
1
&qu
Hi Moe,
you wrote:
>What are the best choice(s) of voting system(s)
>for a multiple winner election?
>
>I can believe there could be more than one depending
>on the type of election.
>
>For instance, we will have a 2 person co-chair in an organization,
>where the idea is to balance any opposing
What are the best choice(s) of voting system(s)
for a multiple winner election?
I can believe there could be more than one depending
on the type of election.
For instance, we will have a 2 person co-chair in an organization,
where the idea is to balance any opposing factions
as they will likely
