I see your point. And I also see that there could be several different
reasonable versions of Voter's Choice, any one of which would be an
elegant way to resolve the lack of concensus on method.
The amount of variation in ballot types would have to be a function of the
time and energy that was av
>don't you think that it would be easier to infer
>all of the other ballots from CR than from a pure ranking?
Yes, but maybe some people will only vote CR, and some will only
vote a ranking, and some will only vote Approval. So it could be
necessary to infer any of those ballots from the other
>don't you think that it would be easier to infer
>all of the other ballots from CR than from a pure ranking?
Yes, but maybe some people will only vote CR, and some will only
vote a ranking, and some will only vote Approval. So it could be
necessary to infer any of those ballots from the other
Good discussion, but don't you think that it would be easier to infer
all of the other ballots from CR than from a pure ranking?
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, MIKE OSSIPOFF wrote (in part):
>
> >I like Voter's Choice for situations where people don't agree on a
> >voting system. Of course if they don't a
I've just tried to post this, but when I did, I received a reply from
eskimo.com, giving me instructions on subscribing & unsubscribing.
A message that I sent later posted, and this message didn't, and so
I'm assuming that it won't post, and so I'm re-sending it:
>I like Voter's Choice for sit
