Demorep1 wrote--
Is Mr. Saari suggesting that if 1 voter votes 100 for choice A and 2 voters
vote 49 for choice B that choice A should outrank choice B ?
Mr. Saari wrote--
This is the problem with most point systems - it is unclear what the points
really mean.
If the two medium votes really mean
In a message dated 98-07-11 01:14:42 EDT, you write:
>Is Mr. Saari suggesting that if 1 voter votes 100 for choice A and 2 voters
>vote 49 for choice B that choice A should outrank choice B ?
This is the problem with most point systems - it is unclear what the points
really mean.
If the two med
In a message dated 98-07-11 20:16:05 EDT, you write:
>And
>if you chose A & B for voting a ratings difference, then why
>vote a small one??
...
>So that's the strategy to maximize your utility expectation:
>If the sum in the previous paragraph is positive for i, then
>give maximum votes to i. If
Is Mr. Saari suggesting that head to head NOT be used in a single winner
election ?
Is Mr. Saari suggesting that if 1 voter votes 100 for choice A and 2 voters
vote 49 for choice B that choice A should outrank choice B ?
I have many times suggested having a YES (i.e. in the 0 to 100 range) /NO (
In a message dated 98-07-09 19:27:51 EDT, you write:
>In my most recent posting, I said that it's optimal, with
>Saari's -100 to 100 system, to give -100 to everything that one
>wouldn't vote for in Plurality. I meant, -100 to everything worse
>than what one would vote for in Plurality. Obviousl
