RE: STV-Proxy?

1997-02-23 Thread DEMOREP1
Mr. Eppley wrote: This variation of Proxy PR is attractive, if there's a good reason to limit the body to a specific N seats. (With the rise of the internet, making telecommuting virtual legislatures possible, a fixed N is suspect.) One of the traits of Proxy PR which may not have been mentioned

RE: STV-Proxy?

1997-02-22 Thread DEMOREP1
Mr. Eppley wrote: This variation of Proxy PR is attractive, if there's a good reason to limit the body to a specific N seats. (With the rise of the internet, making telecommuting virtual legislatures possible, a fixed N is suspect.) One of the traits of Proxy PR which may not have been mentioned