RE: Six criteria

1998-07-04 Thread DEMOREP1
I thank Mr. Schulze for posting his suggested list of 6 criteria. I note that with any reform method there will be polls before the election and that there is some percentage of mindless voters who will follow the orders of certain candidates/ party bosses on how to vote (as in the recent Norther

Re: Six criteria

1998-07-04 Thread Mike Ositoff
I said last week that, when using a flexible point assignment method (sometimes called a "cardinal measure method"), voters would probably use Approval strategy, but that better maximization of a voter's utility expectation could be gotten by calculating different point values to give the differen

Re: Six criteria

1998-07-03 Thread Markus Schulze
Correction: In my last e-mail, it must mean "Anonymity" instead of "Autonomy." *** Dear Mike Saari, you wrote (3 Jul 1998): > If these are the famous "Arrow" criteria, then one of > them (I'm not sure which name) states that the outcome can > depend ONLY on the "preferences" of the voters.

Re: Six criteria

1998-07-03 Thread Saari
ction method to meet >all six criteria simultaneously. Thus, some criteria have to be >relaxed. If these are the famous "Arrow" criteria, then one of them (I'm not sure which name) states that the outcome can depend ONLY on the "preferences" of the voters. It thus legi