Re: Thoughts on majority potential simulations

2001-05-23 Thread Richard Moore
I ran some sims to compare L1 and L2 distance. This is still using a uniform distribution, and I'm still debugging, so these are very preliminary results (and there are only 500 random trials so there's still a significant error margin). But a funny thing happened when I did the L2 sims. The succes

Re: Thoughts on majority potential simulations

2001-05-22 Thread Richard Moore
Anthony Simmons wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]">I have a couple of questions:How will you deal with a situation in which there are, say,ten variables, all correlated, but none colinear? [EMAIL PROTECTED]">How will you deal with the fact that different voters will bepositioning candidates in different s

Re: Thoughts on majority potential simulations

2001-05-22 Thread Anthony Simmons
>> From: Richard Moore >> Subject: Re: [EM] Thoughts on majority potential simulations >> Anthony, >> Some, but not all issues, are going to have the >> correlation you are talking about. Given that there are >> two issues that are really just facets of some

Re: [EM] Thoughts on majority potential simulations

2001-05-21 Thread Richard Moore
Anthony, Some, but not all issues, are going to have the correlation you are talking about. Given that there are two issues that are really just facets of some third issue, we can just let that third issue be one of the two dimensions in my model. But surely there will be some fourth issue that do

Re: Thoughts on majority potential simulations

2001-05-21 Thread Tony Simmons
>> From: Forest Simmons >> Subject: Re: [EM] Thoughts on majority potential simulations >> Tony, >> Your comments below remind me that it would be interesting >> to do a singular value analysis to find the effective >> dimension of the issue spac

Re: [EM] Thoughts on majority potential simulations

2001-05-21 Thread Forest Simmons
soning. I have more thoughts along these lines, but am late for class. Forest On Mon, 21 May 2001, Anthony Simmons wrote: > >> From: Richard Moore > >> Subject: [EM] thoughts on majority potential simulations > > [...] > > >> 4. I am going to use a 2-dimensio

[EM] Thoughts on majority potential simulations

2001-05-21 Thread Anthony Simmons
>> From: Richard Moore >> Subject: [EM] thoughts on majority potential simulations [...] >> 4. I am going to use a 2-dimensional policy space. I am >> going to calculate utilities based on the L1 (Hamming) >> distance between the voter and the candidate. The

[EM] thoughts on majority potential simulations

2001-05-18 Thread Richard Moore
A couple of weeks ago I described my idea for "majority potential" as a better-calibrated standard than SU for evaluating methods by way of simulation. I've started writing a program to try out this concept. I'd like some suggestions on a few things. 1. I have one statement that eliminates clones