I would vote the second one too, it looks cleaner IMHO, and i don't think
we need to have the names of the developers in the source file, those can
be found in the about dialog.
--
Jaap
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Christian Dywan wrote:
> Le 14.06.2012 00:46, Corentin a écrit :
> > The thi
Le 14.06.2012 00:46, Corentin a écrit :
> The things I dislike on the first are :
> * Your Name
> -> Because I don't think that there is only one person working on a
> file, Put the team's name instead.
> * The asterisk, they looks pretty on the second one.
For what it's worth, the name is meanin
The things I dislike on the first are :
* Your Name
-> Because I don't think that there is only one person working on a file, Put
the team's name instead.
* The asterisk, they looks pretty on the second one.
Corentin Noël (tintou)
- Reply message -
De : "David Gomes"
Date : mer., juin
Hi,
I personally think that the second one is better, it's a bit less generic.
Nevertheless, in order to make it simpler, I would change '*under the terms
of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software
Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later
Hey David,
I personally like option 2 more as it more clearly indicates the comment in
each line and as a bonus, follows the same style as valadoc annotations.
I've been also doing comments like that for quite some time now if they are
multiline. I'm however not opposed to using the top style.
Am
*/***
Copyright (C) 2011-2012 Your Name
This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it
under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License version 3, as
published
by the Free Software Foundation.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, bu
6 matches
Mail list logo
