+1
On Jul 13, 2013 2:55 PM, "Dane Henson" wrote:
> One does not simply fork launchpad.
> On Jul 13, 2013 2:52 PM, "Cassidy James" wrote:
>
>> Chris,
>>
>> Launchpad is technically open source, but it's designed to be used only
>> on Canonical's infrastructure and they aren't interested in making
One does not simply fork launchpad.
On Jul 13, 2013 2:52 PM, "Cassidy James" wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Launchpad is technically open source, but it's designed to be used only on
> Canonical's infrastructure and they aren't interested in making it run
> elsewhere. It's open source so that people can hel
Chris,
Launchpad is technically open source, but it's designed to be used only
on Canonical's infrastructure and they aren't interested in making it
run elsewhere. It's open source so that people can help Canonical out,
not so people can set up their own instances.
Regards,
Cassidy James
On
Fabian,
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't launchpad open source? There's been much
talk about Launchpad mock-ups and redesigns, etc. Maybe you could simply
fork launchpad as opposed to creating a replacement?
http://blog.launchpad.net/general/launchpad-is-now-open-source
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at
Maybe the LMDE, SolydXK, and/or Crunchbang teams should be contacted to
see what they are using. Additionally, there are collaboration
opportunities there.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Sergey Shnatsel Davidoff
wrote:
what do we need in order to get our own repo and automated build
infras
So I'm gonna enter that conversation here, if we want to have automated
builds for debian based systems not on Launchpad we really need the
following:
1. Hardware (we already got a virtual server capable of building the
daily isos, so it should be able to handle this, if needed we can also g
>
> what do we need in order to get our own repo and automated build
> infrastructure? Is it a hardware issue?
>
A lot of things I'm afraid. Off the top of my head, the list is as follows:
1. hardware
2. pbuilder configuration (mostly done)
3. some piece of software to accept dput upload
Ah, sorry, I did not mean to press you, just ask as a way to identify were
help is needed.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Cody Garver wrote:
> I'm working on it, I'd like to have it deployed by 14.04 but no promises.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Nikos Vasilakis wrote:
>
>> Hey Cod
I'm working on it, I'd like to have it deployed by 14.04 but no promises.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Nikos Vasilakis wrote:
> Hey Cody,
>
> what do we need in order to get our own repo and automated build
> infrastructure? Is it a hardware issue?
>
> Cheers,
> Nikos
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2
Hey Cody,
what do we need in order to get our own repo and automated build
infrastructure? Is it a hardware issue?
Cheers,
Nikos
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Cody Garver wrote:
> Debian builds are possible when we get our own repo and automated
> build infrastructure.
>
> Sent from my iPh
Debian builds are possible when we get our own repo and automated
build infrastructure.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 9, 2013, at 10:42 PM, Manish Sinha wrote:
> Hello everyone, I have thought, researched a lot before shooting this
> mail. It is a proposal to make elementary a great OS, even bette
Hello everyone, I have thought, researched a lot before shooting this
mail. It is a proposal to make elementary a great OS, even better than
it is currently at the same time making sure the proposals are sane,
achievable and realistic.
Older packages when released
-
12 matches
Mail list logo
