On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Glenn Tarcea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I had never looked at Rucksack before. The code is very well structured
> indeed!
>
> A couple of thoughts:
>
> 1. Could the Rucksack B-Tree code be separated out, abstracted a little and
> put in a separate project (eg,
> I had never looked at Rucksack before. The code is very well
> structured indeed!
Yes, we're lucky.
> A couple of thoughts:
>
> 1. Could the Rucksack B-Tree code be separated out, abstracted a
> little and put in a separate project (eg, a cl-btree, or ldb for
> example)? This would allow othe
I had never looked at Rucksack before. The code is very well
structured indeed!
A couple of thoughts:
1. Could the Rucksack B-Tree code be separated out, abstracted a
little and put in a separate project (eg, a cl-btree, or ldb for
example)? This would allow other lisp projects that are
I just spent some time, with the context of this discussion, review
the very excellent rucksack code base. I think that most of the
facilities needed by our datastore are quite congruent with what
Arthur did to implement his system.
If we really want to get going fast, we should start by b
