[SPAM] commonise

2009-07-15 Thread Maraldo Salen
How to Unlock a Woman's Passion and Make Her Owrgasm - Every Signle Time.www[dot]da39[dot]com ___ elfutils-devel mailing list elfutils-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/elfutils-devel

Re: handling DW_OP_call_frame_cfa

2009-07-15 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard writes: Mark> For completeness, should it also include DW_OP_form_tls_address Mark> (although gcc seems to emit DW_OP_GNU_push_tls_address) and Mark> DW_OP_bit_piece (which gcc doesn't seem to emit)? GCC doesn't emit it now, but maybe only because GDB doesn't suppor

Re: handling DW_OP_call_frame_cfa

2009-07-15 Thread Roland McGrath
> For completeness, should it also include DW_OP_form_tls_address > (although gcc seems to emit DW_OP_GNU_push_tls_address) and > DW_OP_bit_piece (which gcc doesn't seem to emit)? Yah ___ elfutils-devel mailing list elfutils-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

Re: handling DW_OP_call_frame_cfa

2009-07-15 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Roland, On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 12:11 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > What I'd had in mind was just that the interpretation of location > expressions in the application would use the CFI interfaces explicitly. Thanks, that wasn't too hard at all indeed. I added support for DW_OP_call_frame_cfa to