On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:48:16 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> I admit I hadn't thought of that. Now I realize returning the Elf
> without the bias is not as useful. For that the dwfl_file is also
> useful. But we can still make the simplification you suggest.
It looks fine to me. Even with a new tes
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 15:23 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> Maybe you had a reason for it but we could also just replace
> __libdwfl_module_getsym by dwfl_module_getsym_elf now. It would just require
> changing
>
> static inline GElf_Addr
> dwfl_deadjust_st_value (Dwfl_Module *mod, struct dwfl_fil
On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 20:49 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:42:34 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > As far as I understand from skimming the code, you want to provide an
> > (extra) table of (function) symbols from ebl for the elf file it is
> > backing. These symbols are match
