On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 22:42 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 12:18 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
> > On Fedora 21, this appears to be slightly faster, although pretty close
> > to noise levels. Mark, can you see if this helps the performance slip
> > on your el7 system?
>
> It is sl
On 12/13/2014 03:18 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 05:34:06PM -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
>> BTW, I want to point out this change in compare_lines:
>>
>>> - return (*p1)->addr - (*p2)->addr;
>> [...]
>>> + if (line1->addr != line2->addr)
>>> +return (line1->addr < line2->addr
On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 12:18 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
> On Fedora 21, this appears to be slightly faster, although pretty close
> to noise levels. Mark, can you see if this helps the performance slip
> on your el7 system?
It is slightly faster ~0.5 secs on ~55 secs.
>/* Unrolling 0 like uleb1
On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 11:34 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 12/14/2014 02:18 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > This finally adds bounds checking to get_[us]leb128 (with two exceptions,
> > see below). The performance results are a little puzzling, so I hope
> > Josh can take a look how things are for him.
On 12/15/2014 01:11 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 11:05 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
>> +2014-12-15 Josh Stone
>> +
>> +* .gitignore: Add config/compile as installed by automake 1.14.
>
> Yes, please.
Pushed.
On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 11:05 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
> +2014-12-15 Josh Stone
> +
> + * .gitignore: Add config/compile as installed by automake 1.14.
Yes, please.
Thanks,
Mark
Signed-off-by: Josh Stone
---
On Fedora 21, this appears to be slightly faster, although pretty close
to noise levels. Mark, can you see if this helps the performance slip
on your el7 system?
---
libdw/ChangeLog | 6 ++
libdw/memory-access.h | 17 +++--
2 files changed,
On 12/14/2014 02:18 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> This finally adds bounds checking to get_[us]leb128 (with two exceptions,
> see below). The performance results are a little puzzling, so I hope
> Josh can take a look how things are for him.
>
> On one system, with 3.10.0-123.13.1.el7.x86_64, varlocs
Signed-off-by: Josh Stone
---
.gitignore | 1 +
ChangeLog | 4
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 1eda00b80774..8e33bb9b5114 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ config.h.in
config.log
config.status
config/ar-lib
+config/com
We use a couple of bits to keep track of the addr size, dwarf size and
warning given for a loclist or rangelist offset. Normally offset won't
be that big and will fit in 61-bits easily. But if not, don't assert,
but just warn we don't handle such large offsets.
Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard
---
s
Just report invalid data and continue.
Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard
---
src/ChangeLog | 5 +
src/readelf.c | 23 ---
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/ChangeLog b/src/ChangeLog
index 182c9cd..08f9ee4 100644
--- a/src/ChangeLog
+++ b/src
realloc in get_offsets will return NULL otherwise and dwarf_getpubnames
might think there was no issue and try to use that NULL pointer.
Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard
---
libdw/ChangeLog | 2 +-
libdw/dwarf_getpubnames.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --g
Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard
---
src/ChangeLog | 4
src/readelf.c | 8 +---
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/ChangeLog b/src/ChangeLog
index a193f40..182c9cd 100644
--- a/src/ChangeLog
+++ b/src/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
2014-12-15 Mark Wielaard
+
Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard
---
libdw/ChangeLog | 7 +++
libdw/dwarf_getpubnames.c | 16 +---
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libdw/ChangeLog b/libdw/ChangeLog
index 0543740..93651df 100644
--- a/libdw/ChangeLog
+++ b/libdw/ChangeLog
@@
Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard
---
src/ChangeLog | 3 ++-
src/readelf.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/ChangeLog b/src/ChangeLog
index 7247ea9..a193f40 100644
--- a/src/ChangeLog
+++ b/src/ChangeLog
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
2014-12-15 Mark Wielaard
*
Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard
---
src/ChangeLog | 5 +
src/readelf.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/ChangeLog b/src/ChangeLog
index a4f42e4..7247ea9 100644
--- a/src/ChangeLog
+++ b/src/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2014-12-15 Mark Wielaard
+
+ * readelf.c (pr
Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard
---
libelf/ChangeLog | 5 +
libelf/elf_begin.c | 8 ++--
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libelf/ChangeLog b/libelf/ChangeLog
index cf168e7..7406509 100644
--- a/libelf/ChangeLog
+++ b/libelf/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2014-12-
On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 11:40 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> It is December already. Which means it has been more than 3 months since
> the last elfutils 0.160 release. We have had lots of bugfixes and some
> new features. So lets see if we are ready for 0.161. My goal is to
> release elfutils 0.161 a
On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 18:26 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> 2014-12-11 Mark Wielaard
>
> + * readelf.c (print_debug_exception_table): Check TType base offset
> + and Action table are sane.
I pushed this to master.
On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 17:22 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> +2014-12-11 Mark Wielaard
> +
> + * readelf.c (print_debug_frame_section): Check number of augmentation
> + chars to print.
I pushed this to master.
On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 16:37 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> The ELF64 case didn't check for overflow and accidentially used the 32bit
> Shdr size.
>
> 2014-12-11 Mark Wielaard
>
> + * elf_begin.c (file_read_elf): Correct ELF64 section offset check.
I pushed this to master.
On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 16:30 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Don't allow entries or size to overflow the parent file size.
>
> +2014-12-11 Mark Wielaard
> +
> + * elf_begin.c (read_long_names): Check for offset overflow.
> + (__libelf_next_arhdr_wrlock): Likewise. Sanity check the ar_size.
22 matches
Mail list logo