Re: sizeof - kernel modules

2015-06-16 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Josh Stone wrote: > On 06/16/2015 02:31 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:26 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>> On Tuesday, June 16, 2015 02:17:10 PM Mark Wielaard wrote: On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 00:20 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Simplest

Re: sizeof - kernel modules

2015-06-16 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:26 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Tuesday, June 16, 2015 02:17:10 PM Mark Wielaard wrote: >> On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 00:20 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: >> > Simplest probably is to just revert this one patch and do a elfutils >> > 0.163 release with just that (and the trans

Re: sizeof - kernel modules

2015-06-16 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Tuesday, June 16, 2015 02:17:10 PM Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 00:20 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Simplest probably is to just revert this one patch and do a elfutils > > 0.163 release with just that (and the translation updates). The issue > > that this was preventing (disk

Re: sizeof - kernel modules

2015-06-16 Thread Josh Stone
On 06/16/2015 02:31 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:26 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> On Tuesday, June 16, 2015 02:17:10 PM Mark Wielaard wrote: >>> On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 00:20 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: Simplest probably is to just revert this one patch and do a elfutil

Re: sizeof - kernel modules

2015-06-16 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 00:20 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Simplest probably is to just revert this one patch and do a elfutils > 0.163 release with just that (and the translation updates). The issue > that this was preventing (disk full with ELF_C_RDWR_MMAP, ftruncate > appear to succeed, write in