Re: [PATCH] stack: Add new '-n MAXFRAMES' option. Resolve addresses after unwind.

2014-01-07 Thread Pedro Alves
needed) to pass "-n 0" to get the whole thing, because most of the times the stack wasn't deep enough to hit the limit, while in this particular hard to debug bug it was, than it is to have a larger dump than you expected in that same case. Anyway, seems like I've weighed my opinion enough and we're kind of repeating ourselves. :-) -- Pedro Alves

Re: [PATCH] stack: Add new '-n MAXFRAMES' option. Resolve addresses after unwind.

2014-01-06 Thread Pedro Alves
ls that doesn't know about "-n".) > With -n 0 users now have the choice which they prefer. -- Pedro Alves