Hi,
I actually want only libelf, but I don't think it makes sense to split
elfutils into libelf and others.
Actually the patch doesn't consider the dependencies. The change of argp
check should be a mistake. I'll send a new patch to solve those issues.
The testsuite will also be updated.
Reg
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 11:51 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> We this split up and why do you want to enable/disable these specific
> parts?
>
> I don't think it makes sense to be able to not build the ebl backends
> (unless you don't build libasm, libdw and also not the tools - only
> libelf doesn't
Hi,
We this split up and why do you want to enable/disable these specific
parts?
I don't think it makes sense to be able to not build the ebl backends
(unless you don't build libasm, libdw and also not the tools - only
libelf doesn't directly use the backends). And obviously various tools
won't b
Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki
---
Makefile.am | 27 +--
configure.ac | 107 ++-
lib/system.h | 9 -
3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 2ff444e..7abd95f 100644
