I have replaced this patch with a new one that does not use one element
arrays.
Please take a look of
[PATCH] Do without union of variable length arrays.
Thanks.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Is there some simple way that I can test elfutils with fortify or bound
> Is there some simple way that I can test elfutils with fortify or bound
> checking tools?
Depending on your system and build setup, _FORTIFY_SOURCE might be the
default. It's easy enough to enable it with CPPFLAGS=-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
to configure AFAIK.
> How about using pointers and malloc or
Yes, I shall correct the description.
Is there some simple way that I can test elfutils with fortify or bound
checking tools?
How about using pointers and malloc or alloca, and indexing through the
pointers? That should avoid complaints from stronger bound checkers,
although static bound checking
This is misstated. VLAs are a standard feature. What you're avoiding here
is VLA members of structs and unions, which are a GNU extension.
I also don't think you're doing it the ideal way. A union of two arrays of
length one is useless. It might trigger complaints from _FORTIFY_SOURCE
or othe
Prepare to compile without gnu99 extension.
Signed-off-by: Chih-Hung Hsieh
---
libdwfl/dwfl_module_getdwarf.c | 16
libdwfl/dwfl_segment_report_module.c | 16
libdwfl/elf-from-memory.c| 8
libdwfl/link_map.c | 26 +++
