On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 11:25 -0700, Chih-Hung Hsieh wrote:
> Now they should compile with clang.
>
> Used local variables are passed to new file scope functions
> as constant parameters, or pointers, or embedded in a
> 'state' structure.
>
> One simple function "report" is changed to a macro.
> It
I just skimmed but it looks reasonable to me.
Mark, Roland,
How do you think about this patch?
Is this an acceptable way to convert nested functions?
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Chih-Hung Hsieh wrote:
> Now they should compile with clang.
>
> Used local variables are passed to new file scope functions
> as constant parameters, or po
Now they should compile with clang.
Used local variables are passed to new file scope functions
as constant parameters, or pointers, or embedded in a
'state' structure.
One simple function "report" is changed to a macro.
It triggers a gcc false positive -Werror=maybe-uninitialized,
so the local v
