> On 08/09/2009 03:42 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I've done it in commit ebfb648. Please verify that when linking against
> > the new libdw.so your references now get bound to ELFUTILS_0.143 definitions
> > for the functions changed in commit de69d52.
>
> Looks good -- I now see:
>
> $ nm ./st
On 08/09/2009 03:42 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I've done it in commit ebfb648. Please verify that when linking against
> the new libdw.so your references now get bound to ELFUTILS_0.143 definitions
> for the functions changed in commit de69d52.
Looks good -- I now see:
$ nm ./stap | grep dwarf_
I've done it in commit ebfb648. Please verify that when linking against
the new libdw.so your references now get bound to ELFUTILS_0.143 definitions
for the functions changed in commit de69d52.
Thanks,
Roland
___
elfutils-devel mailing list
elfutils-de
> As Roland and I discussed on IRC, it would be nice if using
> _ELFUTILS_PREREQ invoked some symbol versioning too, so that compiling a
> package against newer elfutils would pull up the rpm dependencies with it.
It's not a generic issue about _ELFUTILS_PREREQ.
> For example, I'd like to write c
